|
|
CNET compares your High-Speed Internet options
By
Gregg Keizer
(10/2/01)
Admit it, you have a need for speed. You love fast cars, fast sports, and fast politicians. Even when you're online--nay, especially when you're online--you want to move quickly.
Broadband, the slew of technologies that provide high-speed Internet access, gives you that bit of velocity you crave . With a high-speed connection, you can pull down files in seconds rather than hours and display Web pages faster than you can blink.
But all's not well in the world of broadband. Tough economic times and a lot of very bad business decisions have put scores of broadband suppliers out of operation or on the verge of extinction . It's more important than ever to pick your broadband provider carefully. Unfortunately, that's not easy. Depending on where you live, you may find your broadband options to be either staggeringly diverse or few and far between. Where's a speed seeker to turn?
We've distilled the nature of the top four broadband options--cable, DSL, fixed wireless, and satellite--into concise, clear descriptions, with plenty of pros and cons for each so that you can see their strengths and weaknesses. Then it's up to you to pick, depending, of course, on whether the companies are still in business or you can get their service at your home.
Cable
Cable rules the broadband roost, at least in raw numbers. According to the FCC, twice as many homes rely on cable to bring blazingly fast bits into the house as are dependent on DSL. What does cable have that the others don't? Let's find out.
The Scuttlebutt
Just two companies deliver more than
80 percent of cable Net connections:
Road Runner
and
Excite@Home
. Time Warner Cable (part of the AOL Time Warner empire)
owns the former, while the latter is affiliated with major cable TV
companies such as
Cox Communications
and
AT&T Broadband
. (However, Cox and Comcast, another cable company, recently
announced
that they would pull the plug on their relationship with
Excite@Home come next June.) The affiliations probably won't affect
you personally, since you'll sign up through your local cable company,
which determines its own pricing and rules.
The pros
Technically speaking, your cable delivers much more than reruns of Gilligan's Island. There's plenty of bandwidth in the wire for data, too. In fact, cable boasts the fattest pipes of any broadband option, with maximum theoretical speeds in the unbelievable range of 27Gbps (that's Gigabits per second, folks). Real-world speeds, however, are a whole lot slower, with top ends closer to 2Mbps, and average speeds in the 500Kbps to 1Mbps range. That makes cable two to five times faster than basic DSL, and as much as 36 times faster than a plain-Jane 56K dial-up. Cable, in other words, has zip.
The cons
Changes in cable service, however, may bring some relief as early as 2002. A new set of cable Internet specifications, called DOCSIS 1.1 (for Data Over Cable Service Interface Specifications) should be in place and in use by the end of this year. Among other things, DOCSIS 1.1 will let your cable provider channel data so that your neighborhood network will suffer less slowdown when lots of users log on. (DOCSIS 1.1 will also make possible multiple service levels, each based on a different bandwidth allocation, much like current DSL offerings.)
CNET's Recommendation
Cable costs less than other options, it's available to
more people, and it's usually a lot faster and easier to install
and get going. Even if you're lucky and live where broadband is as
widespread as kudzu in South Carolina, pick cable over DSL or fixed
wireless. DSL offers more flexibility for, say, a small business or
a home office, because it lets you pick your speed and pay more for
it if you like. But for the average home user, cable is the cat's meow.
DSL
This year hasn't been kind to DSL. Providers have
dropped like flies
, with big-time suppliers out of business (such as NorthPoint), filing
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (see
Covad
), or on the verge of shutting down (
Rhythms
).
Those dark clouds, along with the general economic malaise, have put a damper on DSL's growth. While the number of DSL subscribers zoomed to nearly 400 percent in 2000, growth so far in '01 has been a measly 17 percent. So, is DSL dead or just taking a breather?
The Scuttlebutt
DSL certainly isn't as cheap as it once was. Many major DSL sellers
(and resellers), including EarthLink, Verizon, and SBC, raised their basic
DSL rates during 2001 by $10, to $50 monthly. That's a lot of green for
speed.
Prices vary tremendously, though, because there's no such thing as standard DSL. DSL speeds range from a slowpoke 256Kbps to a blazingly fast 1.5Mbps, half as fast as cable on the slow end, right in cable's speed range on the top, and between 5 and 28 times faster than a 56K dial-up. Many vendors price their offerings according to bandwidth; basic DSL runs about $50 for 500Kbps service. That's about $10 per month more than cable but $20 cheaper than pie-in-the-sky satellite service. DSL providers charge from $100 to $300 for a DSL modem and sometimes $200 or more for installation and activation. Sellers often offer promotions, though, giving away the hardware and waiving activation and installation charges ( Qwest , for example, is giving away the modem until the end of the year), while others will let you do the installation yourself to save some dough. Check with multiple providers, if more than one is available in your area, to comparison shop service plans and hardware and installation costs.
Unfortunately, only a third of U.S. homes have access to DSL, compared to 46 percent for cable Internet access.
The pros
Other pluses include minor but still nifty perks, such as these:
The cons
CNET's Recommendation
Although cable service is generally faster, usually sports fewer installation
headaches, and costs less, DSL is the ticket for broadband-hungry businesses.
Not only is it more likely that you can pipe DSL into your business--cable
is not typically strung to workplaces--the service guarantees and business
plans make it the right choice. Of course, if DSL is the only land-bound
broadband available to you, take it. It's better than the best satellite.
Fixed Wireless
Fixed Wireless may sound like a certifiable oxymoron--along the lines
of jumbo shrimp and airline food--but it's also the newest and, so far, the
least-applied route to broadband.
The term Fixed Wireless encompasses a slew of technologies, including cellular, radio, and microwave. In each case, transmission towers connected directly to the Internet transmit and receive data to and from your PC. To communicate with the tower, which can stand as far as 35 miles away, you have to mount a small rooftop antenna--some are as tiny as a VCR videotape; others, such as the one Sprint uses, are about a foot square--and connect it to your computer. The system works a bit like satellite service, but it's a lot more down-to-earth (literally).
The Scuttlebutt
Although big-name companies such as
Sprint Broadband Direct
and
MCI WorldCom
lead the fixed wireless effort, the technology is available only in
limited areas. Sprint, for instance, operates only in Chicago; Colorado
Springs; Denver; Detroit; Fresno, California; Houston; Oklahoma City; Phoenix;
Salt Lake City; San Francisco; San Jose, California; Tucson, Arizona; and
Wichita, Kansas. MCI is even harder to find, with service in Baton Rouge,
Louisiana; Jackson, Mississippi; and Memphis, Tennessee.
Scores of small ISPs offer fixed wireless service, too; many of them are in semi-rural areas where it's cheaper to build transmission towers than to string lines or cable to homes and businesses. If you're hunting one of these, try the Wireless Internet Service Providers Association locator or The List , where you can snoop for ISPs by area code, then use your browser's Find command and the search word wireless to locate service providers.
Those who do live within range of a transmission tower can get download speeds of up to 5Mbps in short bursts, and 1 to 2Mbps on average--18 to 36 times faster than dial-up, 3 to 6 times faster than DSL or satellite, and just as quick as cable. Upload speeds are--no surprise--much pokier: just 256Kbps or so.
Fixed wireless costs about as much as DSL and satellite, in part because of the extra equipment costs. Sprint Broadband Direct, for example, charges $50 per month for its service--right in line with DSL, about $10 more than cable--but between $99 and $299 for the modem and the 13-inch-square transceiver mounted on your roof. (You get a break if you sign up for a two-year contract but pay more for the gear if you want to be able to bail out at any time.)
The pros
The cons
For you, though, oh-so-limited availability should top your list of concerns. For now, only a few can get fixed wireless. Analysts expect the market to grow, since it costs less to build transmission towers than to lay cable or phone lines. e-Marketer , for instance, estimates that by 2003, fixed wireless subscribers will number some 3.8 million.
But there's more:
CNET's Recommendation
Fixed wireless may have a future, but, at present, it's a second-to-last
resort choice. High equipment costs and poky upload speeds put fixed wireless
squarely in the same camp as satellite: a fill-in for those who can't get
cable and don't have access to DSL. Even then, wireless is probably not
available where you live.
If your only other choice is satellite, however, pick fixed wireless. Its shorter latency and much faster speeds leave sky-pointed dishes in the dust.
Satellite
Denied DSL? Can't get cable? The heavens may prove your best bet.
No, don't pray that the cable company hops up and runs a line to your den. Rather, look up to see whether you have a clear line of sight to the south so that you can suck down the Web via satellite.
The satellite ISP technique differs only in degree from the way satellite TV dishes work. When you request a Web page, a satellite receives the info from your dish, which is connected to your PC via a modem and coaxial cable. After bouncing off the "bird" and down to the provider's headquarters, it's passed along to the Internet, just as if you were using a landline such as cable or DSL. The page reaches the HQ, gets beamed up, bounced off, and reaches your dish.
The Scuttlebutt
The two big boys in satellite broadband--Hughes Network Systems'
DirecPC
and StarBand
--both promise DSL-like speeds and always-on connections. DirecPC boasts
400Kbps downloads with 128Kbps uploads; meanwhile, StarBand says it delivers
500Kbps downloads and 40-60Kbps uploads. Neither matches the top end of DSL.
Those speeds are on a par with or slightly faster than basic DSL or cable,
and they're eight or nine times faster than a 56K dial-up connection.
Satellite doesn't come cheap. StarBand sets you back $500 for the dish, another $200 for the installation (you can't do it yourself, since the FCC classifies these gizmos as two-way transmitters), and $70 per month for the Net access. DirecPC's a tad cheaper: $400 for the dish, $200 to install, and $60 per month. Those numbers make satellite the most expensive pick, with monthly fees $10 to $20 more than DSL and hardware and installation costs triple that of the next most expensive: fixed wireless. Since both StarBand and DirecPC use other companies to sell their stuff--StarBand partners with the Dish Network and Primus , DirecPC with EarthLink and Pegasus --it pays to shop around for a special promotion or discount. EarthLink, for example, ran a $300-off deal on the dish, modem, and installation until September 30, 2001.
The beauty of satellite, of course, is that you can get it nearly everywhere. As long as you can set the dish somewhere with a clear shot to the southern sky, you're set. Some caveats, of course: service in the United States is available only in the contiguous 48 states (plus Alaska, for StarBand), although DirecPC does serve several other countries , including Mexico, China, Canada, India, and most of Europe.
The pros
The cons
And getting that signal from the satellite to your PC--neither Starband nor DirecPC work on anything but a Windows 95/98/NT/2000 computer--is a major-league pain. Not only do you have to spring for the pricey hardware, which includes a USB modem that plugs into your PC, you have to line up the dish, a task that sometimes daunts even professionals. (We had to trim a chunk out of a 60-foot Douglas fir to get a signal to our dish.) Setup is tricky--pointing the dish in the right direction takes more finesse than brain surgery, since a slight shift puts it off the mark--and means mounting the ungainly 3-foot-wide dish on the roof or the side of the house and running cables through walls.
CNET's Recommendation
According to the tech analysis company
Dataquest
, a pathetically puny number of people rely on the sky to surf: fewer
than 300,000 worldwide. Even the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
doesn't bother to break out satellites into a separate category, lumping
it in with other wireless ways to connect to the Internet.
Satellite's poor showing--in comparison, DirecTV, the country's largest satellite TV provider, now has 10 million U.S. customers--is directly related to its high price and access problems. No wonder it's the broadband of last resort. If you can get a fast, fat pipe to the Internet through more conventional means, skip satellite.